Understanding Germany's Austerity Obsession
Germany and the euro is one of those topics where people argue a lot but often miss the crux. The debate usually turns into morality contest like germans are disciplined, southerners are lazy, or Germany is dominating, and others are victims. These explanations might feel satisfying, but they hide the more important point, which is that the euro is a system with built in rules, and those rules make life easier for some countries and harder for others.
A good starting point is a simple difference most people never talk about. Some countries use a currency they control, and some countries use a currency they do not control. If a country has its own money, like Japan with the yen or the US with the dollar, its government can always make payments in that money. That doesn’t mean it can spend forever without problems. It just means the problem is not running out of money. The real problem becomes inflation like spending too much when the economy cannot produce more goods and services. In the eurozone, Germany does not control the euro. The European Central Bank controls it. So Germany is in the second category. It uses a currency it does not fully control.
This helps explain why germans talk so much about balanced budgets and discipline. In the euro system, a government can get into trouble if investors panic and interest rates jump. That happened to some countries during the euro crisis. Germany had more room than others because it is richer and investors trust it more, but the basic structure still matters. Inside the euro, countries behave more like big households than like full currency owners, because they can’t simply create euros whenever they want.
Now, when people say the euro is good for Germany, it’s important to ask. Good for whom in Germany? Germany is not one person. Different groups experience the system differently. The euro has been especially helpful for german export companies, firms that sell goods to other countries. Germany sells a lot of cars, machines, and industrial products. If Germany still had its own currency, that currency would likely become very strong, because Germany is successful and sells a lot abroad. A stronger currency makes exports more expensive for foreign buyers. But because Germany shares the euro with other countries, the euro is weaker than a Germany only currency would likely be. That makes German exports easier to sell. This doesn’t require any bad intentions. It’s just how a shared currency affects prices.
Because of this, big exporters and the business world gain a lot. That also includes investors, company owners, and managers. Germany also gains influence because its style of economic thinking like strict rules, fear of inflation, limits on deficits, fits well with how the eurozone is run. In crises, the german way often becomes the standard that others are pushed to follow. That gives Germany huge political power inside Europe.
For german workers, the picture is mixed. Many german workers benefited from stable jobs in industry, especially compared to places that saw much higher unemployment. But Germany’s success in exports also came with wage restraint for many years. Wages did not rise as fast as they could have, because keeping costs low helped keep exports competitive. That strategy supported jobs, but it also meant workers did not always share fully in the gains. It also meant Germany relied a lot on selling abroad instead of boosting spending at home. Over time, that can lead to things like underinvestment in rail, roads, digital systems, and housing, because the political culture becomes focused on not spending too much even when spending would improve daily life.
So yes, the euro has helped Germany in some ways, but not equally for everyone. It helped export industries the most. It helped workers in some ways through jobs, but it also came with tradeoffs like slow wage growth and a habit of being overly cautious about public investment.
What about other European countries? This is where the system can become harsh. Before the euro, a country with economic problems had one important tool. It could let its currency fall in value. That made its exports cheaper and helped it recover jobs. Inside the euro, that tool is gone. Countries cannot lower their own exchange rate. So when they lose competitiveness or get hit by a crisis, the main adjustment tool becomes cutting costs inside the country with lower wages, reduced public spending, and higher unemployment. This is why some countries had such painful years after the financial crisis. They were told to cut spending and tighten belts right when their economies were collapsing, which made the collapse even worse.
This also connects to competition. Germany often runs big trade surpluses, meaning it sells more to others than it buys from them. In a world where each country has its own currency, a country with a big surplus usually sees its currency rise over time. That makes its exports more expensive and reduces the surplus. But with a shared currency, this automatic correction is weaker. So the imbalance can last longer. That can make the system feel unfair, because deficit countries are forced to adjust more painfully while the surplus country is not pushed to change as much.
A useful comparison is Japan. Japan has a lot in common with Germany like strong industry, aging population, and fear of inflation. But Japan has something Germany does not have inside the euro, that is its own currency. Japan’s government has huge public debt, much higher than Germany’s, but Japan does not face the same kind of will markets stop lending to us? panic. That doesn’t mean Japan has no problems. It has struggled with slow growth for years. But its problems show up differently. Japan’s debate is less about we might run out of money and more about how do we grow without causing inflation? Germany’s debate inside the euro is more constrained because it does not fully control the money system it uses.
From this angle, the eurozone crisis was not just about some countries being careless. The design itself made a crisis likely. When the euro started, investors treated different countries more similarly, and money flowed across borders easily. Cheap loans helped create booms in some countries, including housing bubbles. When the global crisis hit, those bubbles popped, banks got into trouble, and governments stepped in. Then investors suddenly focused on the fact that these governments did not control the currency. Borrowing became expensive, and some countries were pushed into deep spending cuts. Those cuts caused long recessions and high unemployment, which created anger and political instability. In other words, the system was missing strong shock absorbers. It didn’t have a big shared budget that could support countries when they were hit hard, the way a true federation can.
This raises the controversial question. What if Germany left the euro and brought back a national currency? In plain terms, Germany would regain full control over its money. That would change how budget discussions work. The government would not face the same kind of we might not be able to pay fear in its own currency. It could respond to recessions and invest more freely, while still needing to manage inflation. It could spend more on infrastructure, housing, and energy, and worry less about financial panic.
But leaving would also be extremely messy. A new german currency would likely become strong, which would hurt exports and force Germany to change its economic model. It could also create chaos during the transition like in contracts, bank deposits, cross border payments, and legal questions. So this is not a simple Germany should leave argument. It’s just a way to show that the euro shape of the system is not the only option, and that the system itself changes what governments can and cannot do.
So when someone says the euro is good for Germany, the honest answer is that it has helped Germany’s export industries and gave Germany a privileged comfortable position in Europe’s rule system. But it has not been equally good for everyone inside Germany, and it has created strong pressures on other countries that do not fit the system as well. The bigger point is that Europe’s problems are not only about character or culture. They are also about how the monetary system is built.


Comments
Post a Comment